UNVEILING THE SHADOWS: EXPLORING SHADOW LIBRARIES AND BLACK OPEN ACCESS IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47413/svhb2k07

Keywords:

Shadow Libraries, Black Open Access, Digital Age, Academic Libraries, Intellectual Property, Unauthorized Access, Ethical Issues, Legal Challenges, Alternative Information Pathways

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of shadow libraries and black open access in the context of the rapidly changing academic library environment. Shadow libraries are alternative systems that provide unauthorized access to large collections of knowledge and intellectual and research content. The article analyses the moral and legal implications of these libraries, their impact on the traditional academic publishing system, and the consequences of their emergence for the global openness and democratization of knowledge in academia. The paper addresses the ethical and legal dimensions of shadow libraries, on the one hand, as illicit micro-infrastructures that facilitate the unlicensed sharing of scholarly outputs; and, on the other, as alternate infrastructures that unsettle the routinised scholarly publication practices of academia. In the process, it reflects on the implications that these libraries have for democratizing access to knowledge in universities, and for the democratization of knowledge access more globally. The study foregrounds the secret lives of these other commons. It attempts to contribute to a difficult conversation on alternative forms of knowledge commons, in this case, the scholarly knowledge commons. The article aims to analyze how scholarly communication, knowledge access and technology are getting reconfigured through such shadow libraries; it also delves into the specific challenges that shadow libraries in India suffer from and the attendant legal issues, and how all this might further affect publishing and academia. This critical account thus finds its place in a context of understanding how shadow libraries represent an element of complexity that is growing with digitality.

References

1. Asim, Z., & Sorooshian, S. (2018). Unethical research trend: shadow libraries. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 136(1), 96–97. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0122210517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0122210517

2. Bajaj, R & Bhateja, A .(2022). Bringing Shadow Libraries out of Legal Shadows: An Opportunity for the Delhi High Court. Indian Journal of Law and Technology, 18(2), Available at: https://repository.nls.ac.in/ijlt/vol18/iss2/4

3. Björk, B. (2017). Gold, green, and black open access. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096

4. Black Open Access: Gdańsk University of Technology. Strona główna. (2020). https://pg.edu.pl/en/openscience/open-access/black-open-access-0

5. Buehling, K., Geissler, M., & Strecker, D. (2022). Free access to scientific literature and its influence on the publishing activity in developing countries: The effect of Sci-Hub in the field of mathematics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(9), 1336–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24636

6. Copyright Act, 1957. Government of India. https://indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2000/1/A1957-63.pdf

7. Derichs, Claudia. (2021). “Knowledge Ecologies.” RePLITO, August. https://replito.pubpub.org/pub/l6sa31dx.

8. De Rosnay, M. D. (2021). Open access models, pirate libraries and advocacy repertoires: policy options for academics to construct and govern knowledge commons. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.913

9. Himmelstein, D. S., Romero, A. R., Levernier, J., Munro, T. A., McLaughlin, S. R., Tzovaras, B. G., & Greene, C. S. (2018). Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature. eLife, 7. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.32822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32822

10. Karaganis, J. (2018). Shadow Libraries: Access to knowledge in Global Higher Education. CrimRxiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.76ae82bb DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.76ae82bb

11. Lawson, S. (2017). Access, ethics, and piracy. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 30(1), 25–30. https://doiorg.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1629/uksg.333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.333

12. Morrison, H. (2017). Shadow libraries and you: Sci-Hub usage and the future of ILL. The Serials Librarian, 73(1), 224-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v01n03_06

13. Ostromooukhova, B. (2021). “Free libraries for the free people”: How mass-literature “shadow” libraries circumvent digital barriers and redefine legality in contemporary Russia. First Monday, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i5.11715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i5.11715

14. RamMohan, M. P., & Gupta, A. (2022). Right to Research and Copyright Law: From Photocopying to Shadow Libraries. NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, 11(3), Spring, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3930041

15. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. In The MIT Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9286.001.0001

16. Swab, M. & Romme, K. (2016). Scholarly Sharing via Twitter: #icanhazpdf Requests for Health Sciences Literature. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association 37(1). https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-009

Downloads

Published

04-04-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

UNVEILING THE SHADOWS: EXPLORING SHADOW LIBRARIES AND BLACK OPEN ACCESS IN THE DIGITAL AGE. (2025). VIDYA - A JOURNAL OF GUJARAT UNIVERSITY, 4(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.47413/svhb2k07

Similar Articles

51-60 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.